The Blog

Rss-black

Sac vs SF? Sure, Let's Do This

Sac15904726_0785425a84

Photo by bsterling                                                               Photo by Mr. Babyman

Sacramento Magazine published its long anticipated story Sac vs SF yesterday and we gotta say, LOL. Sacramento is awesome. I'll give you that. And yes, Lavender Heights is the best name for a gay neighborhood I've ever heard. But better than us? Better than San Franfuckingcisco? You're trippin, Sacramento.

I will concede all arguments about Sac being where a lot of our food comes from, better for conventions, and not dying in an earthquake, but regarding the important issues, here is a break down of why Sac's got nothing on us:

1. Sacramentans sounds stupid.

San Franciscans sounds awesome.

2. Bridge wars

I'm kind of surprised Sacramento would pick this fight. Who cares if the Golden Gate Bridge is "decidedly orange." Golden poppies aka the state flower are also orange and nobody has problems with those. And not to be a dick, but you realize we have TWO awesome bridges, right? And don't kid yourselves, size matters.

3. Ban Francisco is awesome

Having crazy bans and debates over them is something that makes this city great. If you can't stand the heat, get out of our undersized, overpriced kitchen.

4. Mayor 1 on 1 challenge

Everyone knows dance fights (not basketball games) are the only challenges that actually matter. I don't care how tall your mayor is. The real question is: Can he twerk?

5. River Cats vs Giants is not an OK comparison 

You don't compare major league and minor league game prices. Actually, just steer clear of comparing the Giants to anyone else ever.

6. Seasons are overrated

Someone (probably not Mark Twain, although everyone attributes him) once said, “The coldest winter I ever saw was the summer I spent in San Francisco.” But how cool is it that?! Where's your epic seasonal quote, Sacramento?

7. About Sac having cheaper gas, private education, food, rent, sales tax, and Brazilian waxes

I only see this as a testament to San Francisco's X factor. I'm not talking about the magic spell within the city limits that draws ex lovers into each others' paths constantly, I'm talking about that thing about SF that makes all the money you bleed while living here worth it. I wouldn't wanna go broke anywhere else.

Share This

Enough with the Tech Hate

Nerd-path

I was really happy to see the guest editorial by Johnny Koch in this week's Bay Guardian arguing that "Tech Workers Aren't All Evil". I'm sick of all the bitching lately about some lumped together stereotype of a "tech person." It's easy to create a straw man based on everything pissing us off about urban living and set it all ablaze at once. Yes, the rents are insane, as are the prices of some shops and restaurants in The Mission. But the inflated housing bubble is also a national issue. And if you're on a budget, there still are plenty of cheap things to do in San Francisco.

I don't blame an entire industry (and every single person who works within it) for a city growing expensive, and I'm getting tired of hearing complaints from friends and strangers who make mass generalizations about people they likely have never met or worked with. I know we've done our own stereotyping on TBI of tech folks too, but our writers have approached the topic as parodies. It's hard watching the very serious hatred for people who have tech jobs grow stronger in posts and forums. It's not like these folks are making assault weapons for a living. Most of my friends who work in startups are helping build information systems that benefit universities, organize and label your iTunes music collections, and help get the bands you want to see to your city. You can't lump all tech work, or people using the medium to push out new ideas, as evil.

This isn't to dismiss the challenges of living in San Francisco. It has been and continues to be incredibly expensive to live here. As the Bay Guardian also shared, evictions in this city are up. But I wonder what are these "tech people" supposed to do? Not live in San Francisco? And how do we know where every person with a tech gig eats, drinks, or shops? There are other industries – and old-money families – that have gotten people rich in this town.

We also are living in a time when technology is allowing us to innovate and share ideas so differently than we've done in the past. I see the most ranting and generalizations about the tech sector on Facebook, which, I hope these ranters realize, is a product created out of the tech sector. We text and listen to music and post ideas and images at a speed that was unfathomable before, and for that we can thank those who spend their days behind computers. Even The Bold Italic is a product of new technology. I spent 10 years in the print industry before TBI, and I can tell you in that world, ideas move at the speed of old white men with big egos (which is to say, they move with little innovation or openness to shaking things up). It's exciting to be able to act on our brainstorming sessions in a timely fashion and to work for an agile media outlet, thanks to the medium in which we share our work here.

There are organizations working to use technology for good, to make interesting things happen in San Francisco. The tech industry is more than the buses that take its employees to work, and it's more than the amount someone may or may not pay a landlord. The hate being spewed about people who work in tech is getting ridiculous because it discounts so many new ideas and ways to engage with people, cities, and information.

I don't want to go the other extreme and say tech companies are by nature blameless. If a specific company takes advantage of city laws and relationships in a way that hurts San Francisco, that company should be questioned. But I am arguing, as the SFBG editorial did, for focusing frustration about the changes in this city on the very policies causing our pain, and looking forward to solutions for effective fixes. Creating a very general good guy/bad guy scenario based solely on an industry does little to move the conversation – or the future of San Francisco, for that matter – forward.

Illustration by Brad Amorosino

Categories: Tech

Share This

Check out the New Adobe Books!

Adobe

Our friend Katie Conry shared photos of the work-in-progress at the space that'll soon be the new home to the beloved Adobe Books. The shop, which has long championed SF's art scene (literary, visual, and musical), has been located on 16th Street for the past 25 years, but was recently forced to find a new location when the landlord raised the rent. This wasn't the first time it seemed like things were over for Adobe, but the threat did feel very real. Luckily, the community came together and made sure that this little but mighty bookstore could remain open. Katie, along with 13 others, have joined Adobe founder Andrew McKinley to turn the shop into a worker owned cooperative bookstore, art gallery, and community space. 

Adobe Books will celebrate its grand opening at 3130 24th Street in July, but you can get a peek at the new location this Saturday, May 18, at its Marketplace party. From 2-7 p.m., Adobe will welcome local artists and merchants (including The Bold Italic!) to sell their wares at the new storefront. Be sure to stop by and show your support. And stop by our booth to say hello! 

Adobe_2
Adobe_3

Adobe_4

Photos by Tiffany Sainz 

Share This

All the News that's Fit to Embroider: Works by Lauren DiCioccio

Lauren-dicioccio-football

We at The Bold Italic have been longtime fans of the artwork of Lauren DiCioccio. In fact, we carry this San Francisco artist's handy embroidered polyester taffeta interpretation of the classic plastic "Thank You" bag in our online shop. If you're like us and want to see more of her work, you're in luck – one of Lauren's most impressive installation collections, Sewnnews, will be on display at the artMRKT Contemporary Art Faire at Fort Mason, from tomorrow, May 15 through Sunday, May 19. 

Lauren-dicioccio-flag

For this series, Lauren takes important moments in history as they are depicted on the front page of the various sections of The New York Times and stitches them in stunning color. With print media becoming less and less a part of our everyday lives, Lauren has found another way to make news tactile. The subject matters of the pieces range from important sports moments to political history to pop culture. Each of these snapshots are beautifully captured in cloth and thread by Lauren's intriguing style and color palette. 

Lauren-dicioccio-gaga

Wanting to know a bit more about her work, I reached out to Lauren with some questions:

TBI: How do you choose the photos you embroider?

Lauren DiCioccio: When I started this series, I particularly looked for people who were communicating in some way – gesturing or speaking. As the series progressed, I decided that I wanted to represent a fuller spectrum of subjects covered in the daily paper, so I started drawing images from other sections of the paper. I collect images through the serendipity of seeing the paper, and also every few months I will go to the library and pull all The New York Times from the archives to look for source material. It's a fascinating way to travel through time, leafing through every page of a three-foot high stack of newspapers. I really choose the images for their subject matter and narrative qualities, and also the formal characteristics that make the image conducive to my embroidery (size, background/foreground, light, etc).  

TBI: What inspired you to use newspaper? 

LC: I started making these embroidered newspapers in 2006. At the time, I was making paintings on newspaper pages as an inexpensive and convenient surface on which to work out ideas. When I looked at my paintings from years past, I would flip them over and appreciate the exposed newsprint on their undersides – reading the articles and noting what city the newspaper had been from was such an interesting and evocative indicator of time and place. I thought about the newspaper as an object; it has such specific and unique qualities like the way it smells and the way it feels, the way the newsprint rubs off onto your fingers, and the sound of turning the pages. 

TBI: What process do you use for transferring the photos to cloth?

LC: I transfer the image onto tracing paper, and from that drawing, I transfer it onto cloth using a disappearing ink fabric marker. With the fabric in an embroidery hoop, I do a running-stitch over the line drawing, wash away the pen, and start "painting" the image with the colors of thread.  

TBI: How long have you been embroidering and who taught you?

LC: I have been using embroidery in my work since 2005 or 2006.  I learned to embroider from my mom when I was young. We were always doing craft projects – sewing, cross-stitching, etc. When I started using embroidery as a medium in my artwork, it looked pretty traditional. I eventually loosened up my techniques by thinking about applying color and line as if I were drawing or painting.

TBI: I love how the threads extend from the images down through the copy; what inspired that?

LC: I bring all of the threads I embroider with to the outside/front of the embroidery, rather than tucking them in the back and clipping off the excess. This allows the image to drip off the "canvas" or to knot and tangle and turn abstract. I like that these threads show process but also fragility. I leave my embroidery somewhat unfinishedlooking and like them to feel like if you tugged on any of the threads, the whole image might unravel. This conveys the fragility not only of the medium but of the newspaper and the stories it tells, and perhaps of life in general.  

In addition to artMRKT this weekend, Lauren’s work can also be found at  "The Art of Recology" at the SFO Airport Museum and "Faux Real" and the Laguna Art Museum in Laguna Beach. 

Categories: Art & Design

Share This

8 Things People Should Stop Saying Like, Literally, Right Now

4394994175_4ac3382684_z

Photo by oriolsalvador

We've all done it. Said something and cringed with instant regret as soon as the inappropriate, condescending, or random words leave your mouth. You can try and play it down with awkward laughing, claim you were just kidding, or apologize and break eye contact indefinitely, but you will always be remembered as the person who said "YOLO" at a funeral.

I know it's hard to resist the allure of adding chunks of snappy catch phrases to the word vomit of your life. And I'm not innocent in all this. I've been known to throw around "totes" and "peeps" way too frequently. But I'm ready to turn over a new leaf and you can too! Join me in boycotting these tired and annoying phrases:

1. Yay me

If you catch yourself saying any combination of sounds that is, or has ever been, a Disney Channel star's catch phrase. Seriously rethink your life choices. 

2. _____ on steroids

It might be possible to trace this phrase back to someone funny, but it isn't actually very funny. If you find yourself about to use this comparison to describe your new juicer, substitute a more precise word like bigger or stronger, instead of causing me to imagine your juicer with huge biceps and tiny shrunken balls.

3. No problem

Did I say there was a problem? This phrase isn't equally annoying for everyone, but for some people it's reason to throw down. Problem.

4. Double reallys

This sounds like "Really? *pause* Really?!" It seems to be a way of addressing the universe and asking in disbelief if there really is a line at Jamba Juice and if some one should really have to be suffering through such an injustice. It's really irritating. 

5. Not gonna lie

Wait, how long has lying been on the table? I was kind of assuming you weren't gonna lie, so maybe skip saying that. It doesn't soften the blow of whatever you're about to say, a la "no offense." It just makes talking to you take longer.

6. Sorry, not sorry

It would probably be easier to say nothing at all than to say something and then instantly take it back just to make sure your vocal chords are still functioning.

7. Wait for it

It's for your own good that you stop using this phrase ASAP. All you're doing is raising expectations for whatever you say next, and making me super disappointed when you end up saying "boobs." 

Note: This phrase can occasionally be funny if it comes before a fart, but it really depends on the fart.

8. I may or may not be...

This always means you are. Just say that you will be getting shwasted and watching The Lion King this Friday night instead of trying to be coy. That way I'll know how to react and probably even join you.

Share This